Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Many of our ideas about the world are based more on feelings than facts, sensibilities than science, and rage than reality. We gravitate toward ideas that make us feel comfortable in areas such as religion, politics, philosophy, social justice, love and sex, humanity, and morality. We avoid ideas that make us feel uncomfortable. This avoidance is a largely unconscious process that affects our judgment and gets in the way of our ability to reach rational and reasonable conclusions. By understanding how our mind works in this area, we can start embracing uncomfortable ideas and be better informed, be more understanding of others, and make better decisions in all areas of life.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
|
It is a simple non sequitur UNLESS there is context before or after that justifies this claim. There is an implied connection here between being a martial artist and surviving a knife attack. Even more, that the rate is known and the math justifies this statement. On it's own, it is unclear. Here is what would make sense....
So the missing data is what percentage of those who survive have martial arts training. The original claim assumes "the vast majority" does not, but does not state that anywhere in the argument. In my quick research, there is no credible data available that answers this missing question. However, it is certainly reasonable to assume that, given only one percent of the population has martial arts training, that the vast majority of survivors of knife attacks have no training. Summary - while technically this could be a fallacy if it is claimed to be an argument, it is more of an unclear line of reasoning based on an assumed premise that is not stated. At best, clarification is warranted, not an accusation of fallacious reasoning. |
| answered on Wednesday, Aug 20, 2025 08:13:55 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD | |
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
|
|
I'm not sure that this is a perfect fit, but ecological fallacy seems to fit here. The speaker seems to be making the assumption that the martial arts experience of knife attack survivors is reflective of that of the general population, but there are certainly scenarios where this would not be true. For instance, if knife attackers were more likely to go after martial artists, and/or knife attacks were usually fatal and martial artists were the rare survivors. |
| answered on Wednesday, Aug 27, 2025 11:50:10 AM by Mr. Wednesday | |
Mr. Wednesday Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |