Question

...
boniaditya

"If I cannot do it then nobody would be able to do it" Bias

How Nasrudin Spoke Up


Nasrudin said:‘One day a marvellous horse was brought before the prince at whose Court I sat. Nobody could ride it, because it was far too mettlesome a steed. Suddenly, in the heat of my pride and chivalry I cried out:

‘“None of you dare to ride this splendid horse; none of you!
None of you can stay on his back!” And I sprang forward.’

Someone asked: ‘What happened?’
‘I couldn’t ride it either,’ said the Mulla.

asked on Saturday, Dec 28, 2024 11:33:43 PM by boniaditya

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Master the "Rules of Reason" for Making and Evaluating Claims

Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.

This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book

Take the Online Course

Answers

...
AI Fallacy Master
0
The statement "If I cannot do it then nobody would be able to do it" is a classic example of the cognitive bias known as the "Galileo Gambit" or, more broadly, overgeneralization. This bias involves assuming that one's personal limitations or experiences are universally applicable, which is a flawed way of reasoning. Here's why:

1. **Egocentric Bias**: The speaker assumes that their abilities are the benchmark for everyone else's. This reflects an egocentric bias, where one's own perspective is unduly considered central or most important.

2. **Hasty Generalization**: Jumping from personal inability to a universal inability is a form of hasty generalization. Just because Nasrudin couldn't ride the horse doesn't mean no one else can. There might be someone with more skills, experience, or bravery who could succeed.

3. **Appeal to Ignorance**: The statement indirectly suggests that because there is no evidence he can perceive (i.e., no one has ridden the horse in his presence), it is evidence that it cannot be done by anyone, which is not necessarily true.

4. **Argument from Personal Incredulity**: Nasrudin uses his personal disbelief as evidence for a universal truth. Just because he can't imagine anyone riding such a horse doesn't mean it is impossible.

In summary, Nasrudin's spoken challenge reflects a cognitive bias by assuming his inability is universally applicable without considering others' different skills and experiences. These biases and fallacies highlight poor reasoning by overgeneralizing from a single data point—his own experience with the horse.
answered on Saturday, Dec 28, 2024 11:34:05 PM by AI Fallacy Master

AI Fallacy Master Suggested These Categories

Comments

...
0
boniaditya writes:

This is not galelios gambit - Galelio's Gambit is as follows "if everyone derides me and makes fun of my argument then it must be right, because galelio was also ridiculed similarly." No where in the story in nasrudin or his argument ridiculed.

posted on Saturday, Dec 28, 2024 11:38:27 PM