search

Fallacy of Every and All

Description: When an argument contains both universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers (all, some, none, every) with different meanings, and the order of the quantifiers is reversed. This is a specific form of equivocation.

Logical Form:

Quantifier X then quantifier Y.
Therefore, quantifier Y then quantifier X.

Example #1:

Everyone should do something nice for someone. I am someone, so everyone should do something nice for me!

Explanation: We have a reversal of the quantifiers.

Everyone (quantifier X) should do something nice for someone (quantifier Y). I am someone (quantifier Y), so everyone (quantifier X) should do something nice for me!

Assuming one accepts the premise that "everyone should do something nice for someone," the word "someone" in that sentence means "some person or another" whereas in the second sentence it means "a specific person." By equivocating the meanings of "someone," we appear to be making a strong argument when in fact we are not.

Example #2:

Everyone loves someone.
I am someone.
Therefore, everyone loves me!

Explanation: “Someone” (quantifier X) referred to “any given person” in the first premise. In the second premise, “someone” is referring specifically to me. In the conclusion, we have a reversal of the quantifiers as they were presented in the premises.

Exception: No exceptions.

Tip: It really is a good idea to do something nice for someone.

References:

Salmon, M. H. (2012). Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking. Cengage Learning.

Questions about this fallacy? Ask our community!

Uncomfortable Ideas: Facts don't care about feelings. Science isn't concerned about sensibilities. And reality couldn't care less about rage.

This is a book about uncomfortable ideas—the reasons we avoid them, the reasons we shouldn’t, and discussion of dozens of examples that might infuriate you, offend you, or at least make you uncomfortable.

Many of our ideas about the world are based more on feelings than facts, sensibilities than science, and rage than reality. We gravitate toward ideas that make us feel comfortable in areas such as religion, politics, philosophy, social justice, love and sex, humanity, and morality. We avoid ideas that make us feel uncomfortable. This avoidance is a largely unconscious process that affects our judgment and gets in the way of our ability to reach rational and reasonable conclusions. By understanding how our mind works in this area, we can start embracing uncomfortable ideas and be better informed, be more understanding of others, and make better decisions in all areas of life.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book