search

Become an active member of our fallacy-discussing community (or just become a lurker!)

Spotlight Fallacy

Description: Assuming that the media’s coverage of a certain class or category is representative of the class or category in whole.

Logical Form:

The media have been covering X quite a bit by describing it as Y.

Therefore, X can be described as Y.

Example #1:

It seems like we are constantly hearing about crimes committed on our streets.  America is a very dangerous place.

Explanation: The media reports on stories of interest, which include crimes.  It does not report on all the non-crimes.  Assuming from this, “American is a very dangerous place” is fallacious reasoning.

Example #2:

I am seeing more and more miracles being reported on respectable news programs.  The other day there was a story about a guy who had trouble walking, prayed to the recently deceased Pope, now walks just fine!  Miracles are all around us!

Explanation: People love stories of hope and miracles.  You won’t find stories about how someone prayed to be healed then died.  These are not the kind of stories that attract viewers and sell papers.  As a result, the spotlight fallacy makes us think the rare cases, almost certainly due to normal and necessary statistical fluctuations, seem like the norm.  Believing that they are, is fallacious reasoning.

Exception: Complete coverage of a small, manageable class, by an unbiased media outlet, may accurately be representative of the entire class.

Tip: Be very selective of the types of “news” programs you watch.

References:

Tanner, K. (2013). Common Nonsense Based on Faulty Appeals. In Common Sense (pp. 31–43). Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-4153-9_3

Questions about this fallacy? Ask our community!

Uncomfortable Ideas: Facts don't care about feelings. Science isn't concerned about sensibilities. And reality couldn't care less about rage.

This is a book about uncomfortable ideas—the reasons we avoid them, the reasons we shouldn’t, and discussion of dozens of examples that might infuriate you, offend you, or at least make you uncomfortable.

Many of our ideas about the world are based more on feelings than facts, sensibilities than science, and rage than reality. We gravitate toward ideas that make us feel comfortable in areas such as religion, politics, philosophy, social justice, love and sex, humanity, and morality. We avoid ideas that make us feel uncomfortable. This avoidance is a largely unconscious process that affects our judgment and gets in the way of our ability to reach rational and reasonable conclusions. By understanding how our mind works in this area, we can start embracing uncomfortable ideas and be better informed, be more understanding of others, and make better decisions in all areas of life.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book