|
Fallacy?1. Elephants are awesome. 2. Micheal is awesome. 3. Therefore, Micheal is an elephant |
|||
asked on Thursday, Aug 26, 2021 11:25:41 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD | ||||
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
||||
Comments |
||||
|
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Get all EIGHT of Bo's printed books, all autographed*. Save over $50!
* This offer is for residents of United States and Canada only.
|
This logic seems to be "if elephant, then awesome. Awesome, therefore elephant." That is affirming the consequent However, please see Dr Bo's comments with regards to your contributions to the forum. |
answered on Friday, Aug 27, 2021 08:15:29 AM by TrappedPrior (RotE) | |
TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|