Question

...
Bo Bennett, PhD

Fallacy?

1. Elephants are awesome.

2. Micheal is awesome.

3. Therefore, Micheal is an elephant

asked on Thursday, Aug 26, 2021 11:25:41 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

...
1
Bo Bennett, PhD writes:

Some of these questions are really basic. I suggest you simply use the tool I built at https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/search to find it. I am not sure if you are a student or not based on these questions, but this will really help you if you are sincerely interested in learning fallacies. Good luck.

posted on Friday, Aug 27, 2021 06:21:48 AM

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Bo's Book Bundle

Get all EIGHT of Bo's printed books, all autographed*. Save over $50!

* This offer is for residents of United States and Canada only.

Get the Book Bundle

Answers

...
TrappedPrior (RotE)
0

This logic seems to be "if elephant, then awesome. Awesome, therefore elephant."

That is affirming the consequent 

However, please see Dr Bo's comments with regards to your contributions to the forum.

answered on Friday, Aug 27, 2021 08:15:29 AM by TrappedPrior (RotE)

TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories

Comments