|
"Perfect analogy" fallacyThe website Philosophy News has some entries on logical fallacies, and this one stood out to me. It's the reverse of the weak analogy - in that fallacy, two things are said to be analogous, but they are not really like each other. In this fallacy, the analogy is rejected for not being 'good enough', with the implication that in order to be good enough, the analogues have to be identical. This however, would make any comparison pointless - it's like comparing the letter A to the letter A! E.g. Jessica: If we regulate car ownership in this country, then we should regulate guns. Harry: But a gun is a gun and a car is a car. You can't compare those two things; they're different. Although this might not qualify for an entry in its own right, it could be added under weak analogy. |
asked on Monday, Aug 22, 2022 11:19:21 AM by TrappedPrior (RotE) | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Hello! I am social psychologist and author, Bo Bennett. In this podcast, I take a critical thinking-, reason-, and science-based approach to issues that matter. As of January 2020, this podcast is a collection of topics related to all of my books. Subscribe today and enjoy!
|
Perhaps we could tweak the definition of argument from fallacy because what I understood from the article, is that perfect analogies sometimes proceed with a fallacy fallacy. We might not have, however, a fallacy in the original argument. Instead, the fallacy is "appended" by the person committing the perfect analogy fallacy, and then proceeds to argue from fallacy. Example: Identify the principle: unrestrained intake of any kind of drink is harmful to your body. |
|||
answered on Tuesday, Aug 23, 2022 09:58:45 PM by Jorge | ||||
Jorge Suggested These Categories |
||||
Comments |
||||
|