Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.
This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book.
|
No. Sometimes the victim does deserve at least some blame, sometimes they bear some of the responsibility, and sometimes the victim is unreasonably blamed. It depends on the situation. As for your particular situation, this sounds like something you might want to ask a lawyer. |
answered on Monday, Nov 02, 2020 10:55:13 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD | |
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
|
First, one has to determine the degree to which the victim is responsible, if at all. Second, blaming a victim is not automatically fallacious - it depends on the reasoning involved, and could take the form of a whole host of fallacies. |
answered on Monday, Nov 02, 2020 06:41:23 PM by TrappedPrior (RotE) | |
TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|