Is this an Appeal to Privacy Fallacy or what?

"I wasn't, aren't, will and have never been your role model."

Replace above with > "I won't be and have never been your role model."

There’s been a lot of questions lately that have been rambling or unfocused, or as you put it, just plain gibberish.   

I often find people dump text on here rather than try to structure their posts as to provide them with clarity - e.g. in the "person 1, person 2/A vs B" format. The result is that the rest of us have no idea what is even being said, or why the OP thinks there is a fallacy (hint - often there isn't).

Egregiously, some people also simply drop YouTube links, as if they were expecting us to watch a 25-minute video to "spot the fallacy" for them (they're supposed to be doing that...)

Then of course, you get the obvious homework questions. Every so often someone will make a post with a series of numbered statements and ask "where's the fallacy?" Dr Bo usually reminds these people about the purpose of the forum when such posts appear.

I do have to remind myself (and others) that it isn't always intentional - some people may be non-native in English (learning any language is a commendable effort, mind you) which would excuse the occasional typo or punctuation error. But I assume for most OPs, it's a matter of carelessness. I'd encourage those to whom the latter statement applies to take the time to format their posts properly -  if we can't understand it, we can't help!

Very true.  Sometimes even the regulars abbreviate what they say so you have to try to fill in the gaps.