Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.
In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
The person is deliberately altering the narrative to sway others' opinions and gain the upper hand in the conversation. This is not a fallacy in the formal logic sense, but it is manipulative and undermines genuine reasoning and fairness in discourse. It's a combination of logical fallacies (such as straw man or appeal to popularity) and manipulative tactics. Sometimes, this type of behavior can overlap with a false dichotomy. In discussions, it's essential to determine your own goal. If you wish to continue the discussion, follow the technique described by Peter Boghossian ( peterboghossian.com/) in his book, "How to Have Impossible Conversations." Good luck. |
answered on Sunday, Jul 06, 2025 06:07:14 PM by Dr. Richard | |
Dr. Richard Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|