What’s the point?

If there is no such thing as free will, then what is the point in fighting for things like freedom and liberty? 

The question presented contains a potential logical fallacy known as a "false dilemma" or "false dichotomy." This fallacy occurs when a situation is presented as having only two alternatives when, in fact, there may be additional options or considerations. The question suggests that if we don't have free will, fighting for freedom and liberty is pointless, leaving the impression that these two concepts are mutually exclusive or irrelevant in the absence of free will.

To address this fallacy:

1. **Understanding of Free Will:** The concept of free will is complex and debated in philosophy, neuroscience, and psychology. Even within deterministic frameworks (where every event or state is determined by preceding events), people can still have experiences of choice and agency. Thus, the experience of making decisions and the values associated with those experiences can still hold significance.

2. **Practical Implications vs. Metaphysical Assertions:** Even if one subscribes to the view that free will is an illusion (determinism), this does not necessarily negate the practical importance of concepts like freedom and liberty. These concepts can be seen as valuable for societal organization, promoting well-being, and enabling a functioning community.

3. **Behavior and Incentives:** Regardless of whether free will exists, human behavior is influenced by a range of factors, including social, cultural, and environmental influences. Fighting for freedom and liberty can serve as mechanisms to establish just systems, protect rights, and create conditions where individuals can thrive. These goals remain relevant and important irrespective of one's stance on free will.

4. **Meaning and Purpose:** Concepts like freedom and liberty often derive their significance from the impact they have on human lives. They can be seen as essential for maximizing human potential, safeguarding dignity, and ensuring equitable treatment. Their importance isn't diminished even if free will is philosophically questioned; they still hold practical, ethical, and existential value.

In summary, the question somewhat oversimplifies the relationship between free will and the pursuit of freedom and liberty. Even in a deterministic framework, fighting for freedom and liberty can still be meaningful and important for promoting justice, human welfare, and societal well-being.

In short, those who fight have no choice.

Our biology and environment have set the conditions so that the desire and will to fight exists, so we do.