Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.
In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
|
Off hand, I would say avoiding the issue . |
| answered on Sunday, Sep 19, 2021 08:58:17 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD | |
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
|
|
argumentum ad fidentia (also known as: against self-confidence) Description: Attacking the person’s self-confidence in place of the argument or the evidence. Logical Form: Person 1: You know, I see you straining to come up with these really poignant responses, but the fact is they're really quite boring. Therefore, Y is false. The attack is made against the person's style and substance rather than the actual argument presented. |
| answered on Sunday, Sep 19, 2021 12:58:56 PM by Mchasewalker | |
Mchasewalker Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
|
|
The implied argument is: |
| answered on Monday, Sep 20, 2021 02:31:51 PM by Kostas Oikonomou | |
Kostas Oikonomou Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
|
|
Would it be too obvious just to say ad hominem (abusive) ? |
| answered on Monday, Sep 20, 2021 02:48:18 PM by Arlo | |
Arlo Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |