Question

...
Philip

Accusing someone of being 'boring'

What fallacy is it if someone responds to a point by simply accusing the other person of being 'boring'? Because I've noticed that it seems to be quite a common tactic when they simply don't want to admit that the other person is right and they're wrong

asked on Sunday, Sep 19, 2021 08:48:52 AM by Philip

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

...
0
TrappedPrior (RotE) writes:

A parting shot for one who has lost the argument, but wants to make some sort of bravado-fuelled 'last stand' instead of conceding gracefully.

 

posted on Sunday, Sep 19, 2021 10:25:15 AM

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Eat Meat... Or Don't.

Roughly 95% of Americans don’t appear to have an ethical problem with animals being killed for food, yet all of us would have a serious problem with humans being killed for food. What does an animal lack that a human has that justifies killing the animal for food but not the human?

As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.

In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
3

Off hand, I would say avoiding the issue .

answered on Sunday, Sep 19, 2021 08:58:17 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories

Comments

...
Mchasewalker
2

argumentum ad fidentia

(also known as: against self-confidence)

Description: Attacking the person’s self-confidence in place of the argument or the evidence.

Logical Form:

Person 1: You know, I see you straining to come up with these really poignant responses, but the fact is they're really quite boring.

Therefore, Y is false.

The attack is made against the person's style and substance rather than the actual argument presented. 

answered on Sunday, Sep 19, 2021 12:58:56 PM by Mchasewalker

Mchasewalker Suggested These Categories

Comments

...
Kostas Oikonomou
0

The implied argument is:
"Only boring people say..."
I think that's prejudicial language  

answered on Monday, Sep 20, 2021 02:31:51 PM by Kostas Oikonomou

Kostas Oikonomou Suggested These Categories

Comments

...
Arlo
0

Would it be too obvious just to say ad hominem (abusive) ?

answered on Monday, Sep 20, 2021 02:48:18 PM by Arlo

Arlo Suggested These Categories

Comments