Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
This book is a crash course, meant to catapult you into a world where you start to see things how they really are, not how you think they are. The focus of this book is on logical fallacies, which loosely defined, are simply errors in reasoning. With the reading of each page, you can make significant improvements in the way you reason and make decisions.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
Without context, this appears to be just an opinion followed by a unsupported claim. No fallacies.
Person 2 is providing evidence against person 1's claim. No problems (assuming this is factually true). Granted, this isn't strong evidence, but these facts wouldn't seem to be consistent with the claim of person 1.
I take issue with the word "proves" as this could be argued to be evidence that person 1 did make a divisive statement, but we don't know if their intentions were to be divisive, so we don't know if person 1 is doing "exactly" what they are accusing Trump of doing. This conclusion does not follow; therefore a Non Sequitur . As for the clown comment, just some trash talking; not fallacious. |
answered on Thursday, Feb 27, 2020 06:31:26 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD | |
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
|
Ill go with tokenism on the part of person 2. |
answered on Wednesday, Feb 26, 2020 09:15:36 PM by mike | |
mike Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|