Question

...
Jason Mathias

Is there a censored fallacy?

"Social media are censoring conspiracy theories, therefore the conspiracy theories must be true."

People X are censoring people Y, therefore what people Y claim must be truth. 

asked on Saturday, Jan 01, 2022 01:10:01 PM by Jason Mathias

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Reason: Books I & II

This book is based on the first five years of The Dr. Bo Show, where Bo takes a critical thinking-, reason-, and science-based approach to issues that matter with the goal of educating and entertaining. Every chapter in the book explores a different aspect of reason by using a real-world issue or example.

Part one is about how science works even when the public thinks it doesn't. Part two will certainly ruffle some feathers by offering a reason- and science-based perspective on issues where political correctness has gone awry. Part three provides some data-driven advice for your health and well-being. Part four looks at human behavior and how we can better navigate our social worlds. In part five we put on our skeptical goggles and critically examine a few commonly-held beliefs. In the final section, we look at a few ways how we all can make the world a better place.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
4

The claim is essentially that social media companies don't want their users posting facts and things that are true. This is just ridiculous... and a non sequitur

The fact that something is censored, does not mean that it is true and the one censoring does not want the truth revealed. Although that is one reason for censoring (like a private company removing complaints in comments from their website), there are many more legitimate reasons. The reasons needs to be established with evidence, not simply asserted.

answered on Saturday, Jan 01, 2022 01:18:52 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories

Comments

...
1
Jason Mathias writes:

I found it, I guess there is an appeal to censorship fallacy. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Appeal_to_censorship 

posted on Saturday, Jan 01, 2022 01:37:33 PM
...
0
account no longer exists writes:
[To Jason Mathias ]

Actually, that seems to be the opposite, when someone censors to make their statements appear true. According to the website you linked, the fallacy you mentioned would be the Galileo gambit: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Galileo_gambit

[ login to reply ] posted on Saturday, Jan 01, 2022 05:08:14 PM
...
3
TrappedPrior (RotE) writes:

Related to this, people often claim they're being censored when they aren't, to give validity to otherwise questionable claims!

posted on Saturday, Jan 01, 2022 04:39:11 PM
...
1
Jason Mathias writes:
[To Rationalissimus of the Elenchus]

Exactly, I see a lot of click bait titles using this tactic. Is this related to the hypnotic bait and switch ?

[ login to reply ] posted on Saturday, Jan 01, 2022 05:01:56 PM