Question

...
alex

What fallacy is this?

I've noticed people I know to use arguments as follows near the end of a debate that's very infuriating: 

Person 1.Truth itself is subjective.

Person 2. Doesn't that Self Refute itself?

Person 1. I meant Maybe Truth is Subjective

Person 2. Just because something is "maybe" true doesn't mean its true

Person 1 Yes neither one of us can prove or disprove this statement.

Person 2 So how do you both believe the claim and then say its unprovable or disprovable

Person 1 I'm not asserting its true just saying Maybe.

 

asked on Saturday, Sep 25, 2021 05:33:48 PM by alex

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments
...
2
account no longer exists writes:

Not a fallacy, but the debate tactic known as the Waffle. The Eggo Gambit.

posted on Sunday, Sep 26, 2021 04:27:40 AM
...
2
Shawn writes:
[To Prof M]

I agree with Prof M, this is waffling. I would add lazy thinking. Regarding those who keep saying that "truth is subjective and there is no way we can know it," I ask how can one have a real conversation with them on anything? Every single statement you make would be responded with, "oh, that is subjective and cannot be proven or disproven." On a practical level, does anyone really believe such an assertion? If so, how do they function in daily life?  

[ login to reply ] posted on Sunday, Sep 26, 2021 08:21:03 AM
...
0
alex writes:
[To Shawn]

I agree I find it very common though in an argument about anything. Its like a last stand to prevent looking defeated. 

[ login to reply ] posted on Sunday, Sep 26, 2021 09:12:59 AM

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Master the "Rules of Reason" for Making and Evaluating Claims

Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.

This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book. 

Take the Online Course

Answers

...
alex
2

I don't think there is any fallacy as such, but simply obfuscation and obscurantism on the part of both people, where Person 1 is the trigger, and Person 2 is the recoil after the shot.

(This practise is colloquially known as word-wanking).

answered on Saturday, Sep 25, 2021 05:58:40 PM by alex

alex Suggested These Categories

Comments
...
Dr. Richard
1

It could, I suppose, fit under Fallacy of the Stolen Concept, but waffling fits best.

answered on Sunday, Sep 26, 2021 12:06:02 PM by Dr. Richard

Dr. Richard Suggested These Categories

Comments
...
Kostas Oikonomou
1

This reminds me of hedging  
answered on Sunday, Sep 26, 2021 11:19:00 AM by Kostas Oikonomou

Kostas Oikonomou Suggested These Categories

Comments
...
TrappedPrior (RotE)
1

"Truth itself is subjective".

The person needs to elaborate on this statement. However, they also went back on their claim later on, so I don't think they want to pursue that stronger claim anymore.

 

answered on Saturday, Sep 25, 2021 09:19:50 PM by TrappedPrior (RotE)

TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories

Comments