Question

...
alex

What fallacy is this?

I've noticed people I know to use arguments as follows near the end of a debate that's very infuriating: 

Person 1.Truth itself is subjective.

Person 2. Doesn't that Self Refute itself?

Person 1. I meant Maybe Truth is Subjective

Person 2. Just because something is "maybe" true doesn't mean its true

Person 1 Yes neither one of us can prove or disprove this statement.

Person 2 So how do you both believe the claim and then say its unprovable or disprovable

Person 1 I'm not asserting its true just saying Maybe.

 

asked on Saturday, Sep 25, 2021 05:33:48 PM by alex

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments
...
2
account no longer exists writes:

Not a fallacy, but the debate tactic known as the Waffle. The Eggo Gambit.

posted on Sunday, Sep 26, 2021 04:27:40 AM
...
2
Shawn writes:
[To Prof M]

I agree with Prof M, this is waffling. I would add lazy thinking. Regarding those who keep saying that "truth is subjective and there is no way we can know it," I ask how can one have a real conversation with them on anything? Every single statement you make would be responded with, "oh, that is subjective and cannot be proven or disproven." On a practical level, does anyone really believe such an assertion? If so, how do they function in daily life?  

[ login to reply ] posted on Sunday, Sep 26, 2021 08:21:03 AM
...
0
alex writes:
[To Shawn]

I agree I find it very common though in an argument about anything. Its like a last stand to prevent looking defeated. 

[ login to reply ] posted on Sunday, Sep 26, 2021 09:12:59 AM

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Like the Site? You'll Love the Book!

This book is a crash course, meant to catapult you into a world where you start to see things how they really are, not how you think they are.  The focus of this book is on logical fallacies, which loosely defined, are simply errors in reasoning.  With the reading of each page, you can make significant improvements in the way you reason and make decisions.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
alex
2

I don't think there is any fallacy as such, but simply obfuscation and obscurantism on the part of both people, where Person 1 is the trigger, and Person 2 is the recoil after the shot.

(This practise is colloquially known as word-wanking).

answered on Saturday, Sep 25, 2021 05:58:40 PM by alex

alex Suggested These Categories

Comments
...
Dr. Richard
1

It could, I suppose, fit under Fallacy of the Stolen Concept, but waffling fits best.

answered on Sunday, Sep 26, 2021 12:06:02 PM by Dr. Richard

Dr. Richard Suggested These Categories

Comments
...
Kostas Oikonomou
1

This reminds me of hedging  
answered on Sunday, Sep 26, 2021 11:19:00 AM by Kostas Oikonomou

Kostas Oikonomou Suggested These Categories

Comments
...
TrappedPrior (RotE)
1

"Truth itself is subjective".

The person needs to elaborate on this statement. However, they also went back on their claim later on, so I don't think they want to pursue that stronger claim anymore.

 

answered on Saturday, Sep 25, 2021 09:19:50 PM by TrappedPrior (RotE)

TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories

Comments