A person provides his own, erroneous, definition of a concept and then shoots it down based on his error.

Historical archive only. New interaction is disabled.

Sorry, but I'm missing something here. I'm having trouble conceiving of this sort of an argument:

Definition: A cat is a tree with purple leaves.

But cats meow and trees can't meow; therefore a cat can't be a tree with purple leaves?????

Can you give an example of your situation?

Typically classed as the definist fallacy.

Strawman first comes to mind.

Defining CRT as you like, then shooting it down.

Want the full book?

Get the complete guide to logical fallacies by Bo Bennett.

Buy the Book

Take the Virversity course and sharpen your reasoning skills with structured lessons.

View Online Course