Question

...
Bo Bennett, PhD

Is there a reverse of the anecdotal fallacy?

###posting as DudleyDowell###

People say "Oh that's just anecdotal" as though that prevents it from being true. But it seems to me that although it isn't a formal study, it doesn't preclude it from possibly being true.
asked on Friday, Jul 07, 2017 02:29:31 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Uncomfortable Ideas: Facts don't care about feelings. Science isn't concerned about sensibilities. And reality couldn't care less about rage.

This is a book about uncomfortable ideas—the reasons we avoid them, the reasons we shouldn’t, and discussion of dozens of examples that might infuriate you, offend you, or at least make you uncomfortable.

Many of our ideas about the world are based more on feelings than facts, sensibilities than science, and rage than reality. We gravitate toward ideas that make us feel comfortable in areas such as religion, politics, philosophy, social justice, love and sex, humanity, and morality. We avoid ideas that make us feel uncomfortable. This avoidance is a largely unconscious process that affects our judgment and gets in the way of our ability to reach rational and reasonable conclusions. By understanding how our mind works in this area, we can start embracing uncomfortable ideas and be better informed, be more understanding of others, and make better decisions in all areas of life.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
0
There is an anecdotal fallacy, but that is the opposite… it is when someone provides an anecdote as a way to suggest, imply, or directly claim that a general rule is true (e.g., “Smoking does not kill… My grandfather smoked and lived until 101”).

As for your example, it certainly is fallacious. Concluding that something *cannot* be not true because it is an anecdote, is poor reasoning. For example, people often use anecdotes to help others understand a known truth. Claiming that because an anecdote was used, the point it was supporting was fallacious is problematic (kind of rare, so that is why there is probably no name for this). Most people complain about anecdotes in that they are not proper support for a claim (which is true), they rarely reject the claim as a result of the anecdote.
answered on Friday, Jul 07, 2017 02:29:53 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Comments