Does this come off as a slothful induction?

From here:

“National sex education standards right now for K-3 say that gender ideology, that those children need to know by third grade that you can be a boy or a girl, neither or both,” Descovich said. “That is very concerning to our moms and to parents. There is no reason that a kindergarten teacher needs to teach that to 5-year-olds. That is something families should be discussing.”

And why is it harmful to children? They don't explain.

“But the onus of that lies with the parents,” Dr. Phil responded. “They’re in control of the care and custody of their children.”

And will they?

“And my question to you is: What makes you think you know better than a parent about what should happen to a child when they have a life-determining decision about whether they’re going to make a decision about gender or anything else?” Dr. Phil asked.

“You have to call before you give them a Tylenol , and you can’t make a presumption that this child can’t take this information home.”

The folks representing the woke side of this debate didn’t have much to say to that, as you might imagine. One parent — and I don’t like to use this term, but if I were one to go about pasting “beta male” stickers on certain people’s foreheads, his is the first I’d seek out — tried to cite mental health statistics at Dr. Phil, who has three degrees in psychology as well as a year of post-doctoral work.

Good luck with that.

And add an appeal to authority here. Can he explain why there are so many homeless lgbtq youth? 

These are all just claims and opinions. The only clear fallacy I see is this part:

...tried to cite mental health statistics at Dr. Phil, who has three degrees in psychology as well as a year of post-doctoral work.

This is a appeal to authority and perhaps an appeal to celebrity . It doesn't matter that Dr. Phil is notorious for peddling pseudoscience, the fact is that someone is an authority on a topic doesn't make them right by that fact alone, especially when what they say is against facts presented.

 “And my question to you is: What makes you think you know better than a parent about what should happen to a child when they have a life-determining decision about whether they’re going to make a decision about gender or anything else?” Dr. Phil asked.

“You have to call before you give them a Tylenol , and you can’t make a presumption that this child can’t take this information home.”

I think I spot a little bit of a weak analogy here. Just because children have to get permission to use tylenol doesn't mean it's unethical for a kid to transition w/o parents permission. As for a slothful induction (appeal to coincidence) I could see where your coming from. Dr. Phil being a mental health professional doesn't discredit statistics. I could be wrong. As Dr. Bennett said, a lot of this is opinion and claims.