Question

...
LF2023

Bigotry

Is there a fallacy in where one claims that the only reason one is arguing for x is so that they can simply justify their bigotry, and therefore the claims one makes are invalid? 

asked on Sunday, Dec 15, 2024 03:41:51 PM by LF2023

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Master the "Rules of Reason" for Making and Evaluating Claims

Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.

This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book

Take the Online Course

Answers

...
Kostas Oikonomou
2

I think this is an example of bulverism 

answered on Sunday, Dec 15, 2024 05:37:29 PM by Kostas Oikonomou

Kostas Oikonomou Suggested These Categories

Comments

...
AI Fallacy Master
0
Yes, the scenario you described involves a specific logical fallacy known as the "Ad Hominem" fallacy. An ad hominem attack is when someone criticizes or attacks the person making an argument rather than addressing the substance of the argument itself. In this case, dismissing a person's argument by attributing it solely to their supposed bigotry is an example of attacking the speaker rather than engaging with their claims or evidence.

This type of reasoning also risks falling into the trap of "Motive Fallacy," where the motivation behind someone's argument is used to invalidate the argument itself. While understanding someone's motivations can provide context, it does not inherently invalidate the argument they are making. Each claim should be evaluated on its own merits, using evidence and sound reasoning.

It's essential to separate the argument from the person making it to avoid these logical missteps. Sound reasoning involves critically assessing the evidence and logic presented, regardless of any perceived biases or motivations of the individual presenting them.
answered on Sunday, Dec 15, 2024 03:42:10 PM by AI Fallacy Master

AI Fallacy Master Suggested These Categories

Comments