|
|
Jumping to conclusions?1. You sign up in google account. 2. Google asks the username. 3. He didn't told you should write your real name. 4. He also didn't told you should write fake user name. 5. Therefore, you can write anything. |
| asked on Sunday, Aug 29, 2021 10:00:50 AM by | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.
In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
|
Hard to follow what you wrote. But I am guessing it is similar to there being no sign that reads "do not urinate on the subway," therefore, one concludes that it is okay. This is about common sense, the law, and social norms. In argument form, it would be a non sequitur . |
| answered on Sunday, Aug 29, 2021 10:34:15 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD | |
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
