What Is This Common Fallacy?

Just to clarify the question, the fallacy is to describe something with flowery terms that are not necessarily related in any way to the item described, with the intent of making that object seem attractive and therefore (conclude) that it is desirable.   This is found in countless advertisements.

Not sure what fallacy this would fall under.  It's a type of distraction and therefore Red Herring.

No that is not what a red herring is, in this context this is not an argument at all.

Sorry my first posting didn't lay out the Argument, which is:

You should buy Product A because of X, where X is not related to the merits of A, but instead is a description of A in flowery terms that are intended to appeal to the listener's desire to be pleased, pampered etc.  

The argument is not based on a rational connection between the premise and conclusion and therefore is a fallacy (of some type).

Just wanted to make sure you saw my clarification to my original question:

Sorry my first posting didn't lay out the Argument, which is:

You should buy Product A because of X, where X is not related to the merits of A, but instead is a description of A in flowery terms that are intended to appeal to the listener's desire to be pleased, pampered etc.  

The argument is not based on a rational connection between the premise and conclusion and therefore is a fallacy (of some type).

The argument is really an opinion as indicated by the word "should." There is no truth claim being made here. Maybe the consumer wants to be pleased, pampered, etc.? Then it would make sense for them to buy the product if it delivers those things. Advertising gets a pass on fallacies... it is in a category of its own like persuasion techniques.

I see that "Puffery" is listed in your book, but under "Lies."