Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.
In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
The age of the trees themselves would just be incorrect information. Another poster had mentioned that it would be a non sequitur , but that is in fact a fallacy. The age of a country compared to a particular set of trees doesn't really have any bearing on the effectiveness of its foreign policy. It is possible that this person was speaking figuratively - not literally saying that the age of the trees matter, but that Iran being a much older country gives some increased veracity to their claims. I might call that an argument from age . |
answered on Tuesday, Jun 27, 2023 03:59:29 PM by FormerRedditor | |
FormerRedditor Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
|
In addition to the other comments, almost all murderers use toothpaste. |
answered on Wednesday, Jun 28, 2023 11:39:55 AM by Dr. Richard | |
Dr. Richard Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|