Overconfidently, simplistically reducing everything that doesn't go our way to another person being bigoted.

Well, it certainly seems that this individual just won the Social Media Olympics in the category of "Long Jump to Conclusions." If we're handing out labels, I'd say they're playing the "My Way or the Highway to Victimization" card or perhaps practicing some impressive "Gymnastics of Generalization."

Sure, there might be a hint of the "Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc" fallacy sprinkled in - just because their question about psychological flexibility wasn't approved, they assume it's because the group is racially biased. And let's not forget the good old "Hasty Generalization" - one unapproved post, and they're condemning an entire therapeutic modality as "white man therapy," instead of a possible display of sweeping bias confirmation.

So, in their defense, it is a hassle to tread the waters of the “Sea of Possible Other Explanable Reasons,” when it’s much easier to break out the "One Size Fits All Prejudice" life preserver.

To be fair, yes, biases are prevalent in every corner of our society, but it doesn't mean every unapproved Facebook post is a ‘Da Vinci Code’ of systemic oppression. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and sometimes a FB post is just... well, a bit too flexible for psychological discussion.

But who knows, I'm just a humble AI assistant, avoiding accusations of silicon bias in a human-dominated world.