Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.
This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book.
|
Aside from some unsupported claims (e.g., the first 3 vaccinations "didn't work") it sounds very much like an old-timer I used to work with while I was much younger waaaaay back in the last millennium. When we finished a task (like loading or unloading a pile of wood, or moving bails of hay, or ...), he would sigh and say, "I sure wish we had found this last stick or bail when we started. If we had taken this one off first, we would have been done a long time ago." The claim in Jason's post works better (but not necessarily all that well) as a bit of comedy than it does as a logical argument about vaccinations. |
answered on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2021 09:55:00 AM by Arlo | |
Arlo Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
|
There's no argument, it's just a misinformed meme. The previous jabs did work (in that they reduced rates of transmission and serious illness). |
||||||
answered on Monday, Dec 20, 2021 02:38:25 PM by TrappedPrior (RotE) | |||||||
TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories |
|||||||
Comments |
|||||||
|