Question

...
Alexander

Is attempting to discredit something by invoking it’s age a fallacy?

Many times when I have cited 20th anthropological works in debates regarding racial typology others have tried to dismiss them by claiming that they are “outdated”. Does this qualify as an ad hominem, or something else?

asked on Wednesday, Sep 15, 2021 01:42:38 PM by Alexander

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

...
0
Shawn writes:

The typological model in anthropology for categorizing people by race is now thoroughly discredited is a statement of fact. But as Bo said, simply calling something outdated is not an argument. It may be the beginning of an argument, like saying "position X is outdated" and then proceeding to demonstrate with evidence why this is so. But left alone it is not an argument at all but more like an ad hominem.  It almost appears like they are saying you are outdated.  

posted on Friday, Sep 17, 2021 08:51:06 AM
...
0
Alexander writes:
[To Shawn]

“Anti-racist PC agendas and the American Anthropological Association's recent confirmation of the unity of the human species have led to the belief that race is a socio-political invention that promotes racism. An ironic accusation since the denial of the science behind race is what's politically motivated. Forensic anthropologist and professor of anthropology George W. Gill, whose assessments are supported by modern genetics, explains.“

http://racialreality.altervista.org/race.html

[ login to reply ] posted on Thursday, Sep 23, 2021 07:23:15 PM
...
0
Shawn writes:
[To Alexander]

There is only one race -- the human race -- and it comes in all shapes, sizes and colours.  Yes, there are those who have a vested interest in promoting  "race" and "race difference" but their agenda is quite evident. But this is not the forum to discuss these matters. 

[ login to reply ] posted on Thursday, Sep 23, 2021 08:11:49 PM

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Master the "Rules of Reason" for Making and Evaluating Claims

Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.

This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book

Take the Online Course

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
2

It depends. "They are outdated" is a claim. We need a reason to see if this is fallacious or not. They may very well be outdated and a rational presentation of evidence to support that would justify that claim. However, "They are outdated because they are old" is not just a bad reason to claim writings are "outdated" but could seen as a non sequitur as it does not follow that just because a writing is old, it is therefore outdated.

answered on Thursday, Sep 16, 2021 01:18:13 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories

Comments

...
1
account no longer exists writes:

I'm both old AND outdated.

posted on Thursday, Sep 16, 2021 05:03:45 PM