|
|
What fallacy can be spotted in this statementThe more I study books the more I realise that I don't know anything. |
| asked on Thursday, Nov 14, 2024 04:37:51 AM by Burtons | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.
This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book.
|
|
The statement "The more I study books the more I realise that I don't know anything" can be associated with the "Paradox of Knowledge" or the "Socratic Paradox," rather than a logical fallacy. This statement reflects a phenomenon where gaining more knowledge makes one more aware of their own ignorance. As one's understanding deepens, they become more cognizant of the vast amount of information that they do not yet know, which can lead them to feel more ignorant despite actually becoming more knowledgeable.
This isn't a logical fallacy in the traditional sense. However, if the statement were interpreted to mean that studying books results in knowing less, that interpretation would be illogical. Proper understanding should recognize that increased awareness of ignorance is a sign of growing knowledge, not a reduction in it. This can be linked to the Dunning-Kruger effect, a cognitive bias where individuals with low ability at a task overestimate their ability, while those with higher ability may underestimate their competence, as they are more aware of the complexities involved. |
| answered on Thursday, Nov 14, 2024 04:38:12 AM by AI Fallacy Master | |
AI Fallacy Master Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
|
|
“The more I study books the more I realise that I don't know anything.” Is internally contradictory, and, therefore, a fallacy, to realize anything is to realize something, makes the proposition such. However, “The more I study books the more I realise that I don't know everything” is more accurate. However, to logically address this statement you must set forth the underlying assumptions. |
| answered on Thursday, Nov 14, 2024 12:35:47 PM by Dr. Richard | |
Dr. Richard Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
