Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Get all EIGHT of Bo's printed books, all autographed*. Save over $50!
* This offer is for residents of United States and Canada only.
|
I'd say this is a version of the galileo fallacy - in that one, "Everyone thought Galileo was wrong too, but he turned out to be right" is used as justification for believing someone spouting any old nonsense. The rebuttal to this is that while there may be a few examples of things which seemed ludicrous turning out to be true, the vast majority of ludicrous seeming things were not true. |
answered on Saturday, Sep 05, 2020 04:33:55 PM by Jim Cliff | |
Jim Cliff Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
|
The two statements are merely opinions, while the third "supportive" statement might be merely an analogy, and only weak and just contentious. At a minimum, the proponent needs to clarify the validity of the analogy. If the only basis for supporting A is that the two (A and X) were similarly initially refuted, it is an example of non sequitur and argument from ignorance |
answered on Tuesday, Sep 08, 2020 07:56:59 AM by DrBill | |
DrBill Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|