Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.
This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book.
|
|
I view this as a political policy issue, not a logical issue. |
| answered on Wednesday, Jul 16, 2025 02:02:23 PM by Dr. Richard | |
Dr. Richard Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
|
|
This is likely an example of inconsistency . However, there is one potential pitfall, that their opposition to housing homeless people in hotels is not stated in their argument, and it seems to be assumed that they hold this position. However, as they're a politician, it's likely that they've made public statements about their position, voted on the issue, or at the very least failed to advanced the issue of housing the homeless while in office, and you could infer their position from this. |
| answered on Wednesday, Jul 16, 2025 06:47:41 PM by Mr. Wednesday | |
Mr. Wednesday Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
|
|
What you're referring to in general is rationalization . |
| answered on Thursday, Jul 17, 2025 04:42:39 PM by Kostas Oikonomou | |
Kostas Oikonomou Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |