Question

...
Jim Cliff

Is this a specific fallacy

Recently a local UK politician complained about migrants being accommodated in hotels or housing that are "needed for British homeless" - but unhoused people in Britain are rarely if ever put in such hotels or available housing, and this politician would not support that anyway.

It made me think of people who say for example that the US should not send aid abroad when there are poor people in the US, but are also against welfare for low income Americans.

Is this a specific fallacy?

asked on Wednesday, Jul 16, 2025 01:12:13 PM by Jim Cliff

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Eat Meat... Or Don't.

Roughly 95% of Americans don’t appear to have an ethical problem with animals being killed for food, yet all of us would have a serious problem with humans being killed for food. What does an animal lack that a human has that justifies killing the animal for food but not the human?

As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.

In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Dr. Richard
0

I view this as a political policy issue, not a logical issue.

answered on Wednesday, Jul 16, 2025 02:02:23 PM by Dr. Richard

Dr. Richard Suggested These Categories

Comments

...
Mr. Wednesday
0

This is likely an example of inconsistency .

However, there is one potential pitfall, that their opposition to housing homeless people in hotels is not stated in their argument, and it seems to be assumed that they hold this position. However, as they're a politician, it's likely that they've made public statements about their position, voted on the issue, or at the very least failed to advanced the issue of housing the homeless while in office, and you could infer their position from this.

answered on Wednesday, Jul 16, 2025 06:47:41 PM by Mr. Wednesday

Mr. Wednesday Suggested These Categories

Comments

...
Kostas Oikonomou
0

What you're referring to in general is rationalization .

answered on Thursday, Jul 17, 2025 04:42:39 PM by Kostas Oikonomou

Kostas Oikonomou Suggested These Categories

Comments