(also known as: argument by stubbornness, invincible ignorance fallacy)
Description: This is a refusal to accept a well-proven argument for one of many reasons related to stubbornness. It can also be the refusal to argue about a claim that one supports.
Argument X is well-argued.
Person 1 has no objections to the argument, besides just refusing to accept the conclusion.
Therefore, argument X is not true.
Dad: You are failing math since you moved the Xbox to your room. You have been playing video games for at least 6 hours each day since. Before that, you consistently got A's and B's. Don't you think that the video games are the real problem here?
Explanation: Blake is offering no counter argument or reasoning for rejecting his dad's well-articulated argument. He is simply being stubborn.
Cathy: I hate everything about Michelle Obama!
Jorge: Do you hate that she launched the national campaign, "Let's Move!," to reduce childhood obesity?
Jorge: Do you hate that she launched the national veterans' campaign, "Joining Forces," with Dr. Jill Biden?
Jorge: Do you hate that she traveled to Africa for a week to focus on youth leadership, education, health, and wellness?
Jorge: Do you hate that she launched the national campaign, "Reach Higher," a higher education initiative?
Jorge: Do you hate that she launched the national campaign, "Let Girls Learn," a global focus on girls' education?
Jorge: Do you hate her well-toned triceps and biceps?
Cathy: Yes, especially those!
Explanation: Unreasonable people tend to engage in black-and-white thinking and are committed to an ideological position at any expense—including reason. Cathy is one of those people.
Tip: As a reminder, avoid absolutes. Instead of saying that you "hate everything" about someone, say something such as, "there's not much I like about..."