Question

...
Aaron

Christian says hugging is a sin

Id like to know what logical fallacy(s) this is.
"sin" is a relative term, so im sticking with logic when looking at this.
A christian (radical) does not hug because it is "wrong" in their eyes.
It is absurd, but its what they believe, i respect that, and id like to know the logic, or fallacious logic supporting their claim.
---------------------------------------
Christians avoid sin
touching before marriage is a sin
Therefore touching anyone other than your spouse is a sin
Hugging is touching
Therefore hugging is a sin

Accident Fallacy?
Over simplification?
Does not seem to be slippery slope.

Ideas please :)
asked on Friday, Mar 02, 2018 10:33:36 AM by Aaron

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Uncomfortable Ideas: Facts don't care about feelings. Science isn't concerned about sensibilities. And reality couldn't care less about rage.

This is a book about uncomfortable ideas—the reasons we avoid them, the reasons we shouldn’t, and discussion of dozens of examples that might infuriate you, offend you, or at least make you uncomfortable.

Many of our ideas about the world are based more on feelings than facts, sensibilities than science, and rage than reality. We gravitate toward ideas that make us feel comfortable in areas such as religion, politics, philosophy, social justice, love and sex, humanity, and morality. We avoid ideas that make us feel uncomfortable. This avoidance is a largely unconscious process that affects our judgment and gets in the way of our ability to reach rational and reasonable conclusions. By understanding how our mind works in this area, we can start embracing uncomfortable ideas and be better informed, be more understanding of others, and make better decisions in all areas of life.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
0
This is simply a case of poor interpretation of ambiguous text due to many factors such as biases, extreme views, and lack of comprehension, to name a few. Unless there is an argument here, no fallacies are involved.
answered on Friday, Mar 02, 2018 10:47:49 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Comments

...
Mike
0
Christian is an adjective
Aaron besmirch Christians
Therefore aaron is illogical, rude, and what not

Let's try another by interpolating Christian and Aaron in a logical way:

Aaron says hugging is a sin
Sin is ugly
Therefore Aaron is absurding's
And we can go on and
on with further counter
Besmiching examples and
Not necessarily by Christian
alike

Summary a no fallacy, that is Aaron has got using mixed-up answer "euphemism fallacy," at least in grammar to say nut's the least logic.

:)
answered on Sunday, Mar 11, 2018 06:05:59 PM by Mike

Comments

...
Stephen A
0
I find that it is helpful to simplify the concept of 'sin' to mean 'to intentionally cause someone unnecessary suffering.' I understand that more religiously motivated can interpret 'sin' in much more militant way, to include for example, menstruating women mingling in public, cutting one's beard into 'trendy' designs, and to question the veracity of a book of half-baked superstitions.
answered on Monday, Mar 12, 2018 01:46:51 AM by Stephen A

Comments

...
Ad Hominem Info
0
Underneath it all there is at least some very severe case of magical thinking , or how else would you describe the belief that there is some supernatural being which imposes moral imperatives?
answered on Tuesday, Apr 17, 2018 10:30:34 AM by Ad Hominem Info

Comments