Question

...
Jim Cliff

Accusing people of 'playing the racist card'.

Let's say, hypothetically, that a President says something overtly racist.

His opponents, especially those who are part of the attacked group, call his comments racist.

Then the President and his supporters make the following claim:

"You guys just call anyone who disagrees with you racist."

This is factually wrong, and can be shown to be so (which seems to matter less and less these days) and the original comments were objectively racist.

Is the defence just a lie, or does it conform to some specific fallacy? It is a Straw Man or is there one that fits better?
asked on Friday, Jul 26, 2019 05:19:27 AM by Jim Cliff

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Eat Meat... Or Don't.

Roughly 95% of Americans don’t appear to have an ethical problem with animals being killed for food, yet all of us would have a serious problem with humans being killed for food. What does an animal lack that a human has that justifies killing the animal for food but not the human?

As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.

In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
1
I think it is just a simple case of exaggeration or hyperbole .
answered on Friday, Jul 26, 2019 05:58:11 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Comments

...
Bill
0
I'll go w/ Dr. Bo on hyperbole. That about says it.

It's also a basic diversion. There are several logical fallacies involved there: shifting ground, red herring, etc.

It's hard to talk about issues when people get defensive, isn't it?
answered on Friday, Jul 26, 2019 02:20:57 PM by Bill

Comments

...
Aryan
0

I think the president would be commiting an Ad Hoc Rescue

answered on Tuesday, Mar 10, 2020 02:15:21 PM by Aryan

Aryan Suggested These Categories

Comments