Question

...
Jim Cliff

Accusing people of 'playing the racist card'.

Let's say, hypothetically, that a President says something overtly racist.

His opponents, especially those who are part of the attacked group, call his comments racist.

Then the President and his supporters make the following claim:

"You guys just call anyone who disagrees with you racist."

This is factually wrong, and can be shown to be so (which seems to matter less and less these days) and the original comments were objectively racist.

Is the defence just a lie, or does it conform to some specific fallacy? It is a Straw Man or is there one that fits better?
asked on Friday, Jul 26, 2019 05:19:27 AM by Jim Cliff

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Uncomfortable Ideas: Facts don't care about feelings. Science isn't concerned about sensibilities. And reality couldn't care less about rage.

This is a book about uncomfortable ideas—the reasons we avoid them, the reasons we shouldn’t, and discussion of dozens of examples that might infuriate you, offend you, or at least make you uncomfortable.

Many of our ideas about the world are based more on feelings than facts, sensibilities than science, and rage than reality. We gravitate toward ideas that make us feel comfortable in areas such as religion, politics, philosophy, social justice, love and sex, humanity, and morality. We avoid ideas that make us feel uncomfortable. This avoidance is a largely unconscious process that affects our judgment and gets in the way of our ability to reach rational and reasonable conclusions. By understanding how our mind works in this area, we can start embracing uncomfortable ideas and be better informed, be more understanding of others, and make better decisions in all areas of life.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
1
I think it is just a simple case of exaggeration or hyperbole .
answered on Friday, Jul 26, 2019 05:58:11 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Comments

...
Bill
0
I'll go w/ Dr. Bo on hyperbole. That about says it.

It's also a basic diversion. There are several logical fallacies involved there: shifting ground, red herring, etc.

It's hard to talk about issues when people get defensive, isn't it?
answered on Friday, Jul 26, 2019 02:20:57 PM by Bill

Comments

...
Aryan
0

I think the president would be commiting an Ad Hoc Rescue

answered on Tuesday, Mar 10, 2020 02:15:21 PM by Aryan

Aryan Suggested These Categories

Comments