|
|
When you need more time to prove even if you have been proven wrong again and again1.When you ask for more time in order to prove your point right dispite of you have been proven wrong again and again.
Sometimes you were always right and you have to wait and be wrong for a while, but sometimes you were always wrong but ask for more time as a justification to mask your error |
| asked on Thursday, Nov 14, 2019 12:04:44 PM by Joaquín García | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Hello! I am social psychologist and author, Bo Bennett. In this podcast, I take a critical thinking-, reason-, and science-based approach to issues that matter. As of January 2020, this podcast is a collection of topics related to all of my books. Subscribe today and enjoy!
|
|
Person 1 claims X is true and can prove it
Person 2 says s/he's been given ample opportunity and has failed each time Person 1 responds I can still prove it I just need more time. I don't see the error or deception in logic as Person I may indeed just need more time. It's possible. There could be many reasons for requiring more time. Continuances occur all of the time in both legal and scientific arenas. Quite acceptable. Now, if it's just a stall tactic and Person 1 is deceptively avoiding the inevitability of being wrong. It could be a form of Ad hoc rescue. |
| answered on Thursday, Nov 14, 2019 02:21:05 PM by mchasewalker |
Comments |
|
| |