Question

...
Connor

What Fallacy would this be?

(Insert Name), would you give the public an apology for lying about what you said?
asked on Thursday, Dec 05, 2019 11:51:53 AM by Connor

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Eat Meat... Or Don't.

Roughly 95% of Americans don’t appear to have an ethical problem with animals being killed for food, yet all of us would have a serious problem with humans being killed for food. What does an animal lack that a human has that justifies killing the animal for food but not the human?

As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.

In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
0
Begging the question (assuming it is not agreed that he lie about what was said).
answered on Thursday, Dec 05, 2019 11:54:18 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Comments

...
mchasewalker
0
It's a loaded question (pseudo-logical) fallacy because as it begs for an apology it assumes the person was lying. If s/he says yes it confirms
s/he was lying. If s/he says no it suggests s/he is an unapologetic liar.
answered on Thursday, Dec 05, 2019 11:59:40 AM by mchasewalker

Comments