Question

...
Chris

All thought is metaphorical

I've heard the claim "all thought is metaphorical"; I've heard almost as many times the following retort: "all thought is metaphorical is logically equivalent to saying 'no thought is metaphorical'".
However, I don't see a problem with the initial claim. I can imagine a scenario where someone demonstrates that at the root of our cognitive process (not biological) rest on some metaphorical mechanism to achieve what we call 'thought'. This doesn't seem trivial or meaningless.
asked on Tuesday, Sep 20, 2016 01:15:07 AM by Chris

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Like the Site? You'll Love the Book!

This book is a crash course, meant to catapult you into a world where you start to see things how they really are, not how you think they are.  The focus of this book is on logical fallacies, which loosely defined, are simply errors in reasoning.  With the reading of each page, you can make significant improvements in the way you reason and make decisions.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
0
"Something is metaphorical when you use it to stand for, or symbolize, another thing" is the definition that would best be applied here. So without being extremely argumentative and difficult, one would have to agree here. As for it being the same as "no thought is metaphorical," this would need explanation. Perhaps it is just me, but I see no connection here. It seems like a simple unjustified claim.
answered on Tuesday, Sep 20, 2016 07:05:38 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Comments

...
Frank
0
I believe that the person submitting the question intended 'all thought is metaphysical,' which is part of the claim by many Christian apologists that the mind and consciousness cannot have a natural origin in the brain proposing a form of necessary dualism.

If this is the case the proposal is 'begging the question' assuming the lack of objective evidence that ALL consciousness, thought and mind originate naturally from the brain, therefore the the origin of consciousness and the mind must be metaphysical.
answered on Tuesday, Sep 20, 2016 08:29:12 AM by Frank

Comments