This to me seems an ill-considered slur, and an emotional claim intended to discredit atheism.
There are specific terms for the misleading nature of the claims here, so excuse my ignorance in not applying them.
"
I don't have many arguments against it, but it's not a helpful or practical way of life. It can't produce any value to society."
- 'not helpful.' Atheism does not claim to be able to 'help' with anything. It is simply a personal belief.
- '...practical.' I know of no atheist who claims that the premise of denying or disbelieving in a particular superstition has any 'practical' value. Atheists are exercising their freedom of intellectual choice.
- 'way of life.' It is not 'a way of life.' It does not claim to be. All atheists I've ever met live their lives totally untouched by preoccupation with myths and belief systems.
'produce any value to society.' What? You can apply that argument to professional soccer players. They do not produce any value to society. So what?
The argument strings together a collection of responsibilities and duties that the speaker presupposes an intellectual stance should have. It indicts atheism for 'faults' which are irrelevant. The speaker claims that an intellectual choice should be 'helpful,' 'practical' and 'a way of life.' Since when?
The argument is a series of cheap shots that attempt to discredit something by attributing irrelevant faults to it.