Question

...
Mandi

“Just Being Mean”

Hi again Bo and community of logical fallacians,

“You disagree with him (or you don’t accept his argument) because you harbor hatred in your heart and you only want to see him fail. You’re just being mean. [Therefore your argument is invalid.]”

Ad Hominem - Abusive / Appeal to Motive, or are there other potential classifications?

Cheers!

+bonus if you can guess the original subject of the suspected fallacy.
asked on Wednesday, Jan 31, 2018 05:18:35 AM by Mandi

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Reason: Books I & II

This book is based on the first five years of The Dr. Bo Show, where Bo takes a critical thinking-, reason-, and science-based approach to issues that matter with the goal of educating and entertaining. Every chapter in the book explores a different aspect of reason by using a real-world issue or example.

Part one is about how science works even when the public thinks it doesn't. Part two will certainly ruffle some feathers by offering a reason- and science-based perspective on issues where political correctness has gone awry. Part three provides some data-driven advice for your health and well-being. Part four looks at human behavior and how we can better navigate our social worlds. In part five we put on our skeptical goggles and critically examine a few commonly-held beliefs. In the final section, we look at a few ways how we all can make the world a better place.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
0
I would say that this is a claim based on perspective. If the person saying this were to add "I suspect" before the statement, I would see nothing wrong with it (logically). Of course, the person's opinion could be totally off-base. People who do harbor hatred or ill will towards another do have strong bias that often leads to disagreement with the person. This is not uncommon. I would say that this is a good opportunity to respond with "No, I disagree with him because he is making wild claims contrary to all known evidence such as..."

Bonus: Subject is Trump
answered on Wednesday, Jan 31, 2018 05:49:36 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Comments

...
NJH
0
Unless there is clear evidence that the fellow is mean and hateful - I would call this the "I can mind-read" move.
Claiming to have special knowledge that one does not have access to. A belief, a kind of fake or pretend knowledge.

To which I would respond "I cannot see into peoples' hearts - I am not a mind reader - and neither are you.
answered on Thursday, Feb 01, 2018 04:35:07 PM by NJH

Comments