Is "sins of the father" a logical fallacy?

Question

JP	Is "sins of the father" a logical fallacy? I've come across comments attacking the original poster of an issue which the OP brought up, an issue about corrupt politicos. The attackers claim that since the OP's father has a graft case pending in courts, then OP does not have the moral ascendancy to call out the corrupt politicos. It is clearly a logical fallacy, and it certainly has aspects of tu quoque / whataboutism, maybe guilt by association as well, but is there a definitive type of logical fallacy which it falls under?
	asked on Thursday, May 24, 2018 05:08:45 AM by JP
Top Categories Suggested by Community
Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Uncomfortable Ideas: Facts don't care about feelings. Science isn't concerned about sensibilities. And reality couldn't care less about rage.

This is a book about uncomfortable ideas—the reasons we avoid them, the reasons we shouldn’t, and discussion of dozens of examples that might infuriate you, offend you, or at least make you uncomfortable.

Many of our ideas about the world are based more on feelings than facts, sensibilities than science, and rage than reality. We gravitate toward ideas that make us feel comfortable in areas such as religion, politics, philosophy, social justice, love and sex, humanity, and morality. We avoid ideas that make us feel uncomfortable. This avoidance is a largely unconscious process that affects our judgment and gets in the way of our ability to reach rational and reasonable conclusions. By understanding how our mind works in this area, we can start embracing uncomfortable ideas and be better informed, be more understanding of others, and make better decisions in all areas of life.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

Bo Bennett, PhD 0	I think you identified the fallacious parts of this well with the other fallacies. There is no specific fallacy that covers a "sins of the father" type of argument. It could be argued (and often is) that the child benefits significantly from the sins of the father, therefore, the child is at least partly responsible. As for its legitimacy, it would be on a case-by-case basis. Some times this might make sense; most times is does not.
	answered on Thursday, May 24, 2018 06:00:31 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD
Comments

mchasewalker 0	Haha, I believe this to be a literal genetic fallacy
	answered on Tuesday, May 29, 2018 01:02:52 PM by mchasewalker
Comments