Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.
In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
I think the reverse ad hom can be categorized under the genetic fallacy, which is the fallacy of deeming a claim true or false in virtue of the origin of the claim, and the origin can include the claimant's achievements, credentials, intelligence, history, etc.
Here are a few examples of the genetic fallacy from another website<>: 1. My parents told me that God exists; therefore, God exists. 2. My sixth grade teacher, Mr. Harris, said that all women are bad drivers, so it must be true. 3. I have known the mayor since I was five years old. So, if she says that the commissioners are corrupt, then it must be true. |
answered on Friday, Dec 13, 2019 01:05:34 PM by Abdulazeez |
Comments |
|