George Washington vs Robert E. Lee

Hi. I'm working on a book about mind control and am intrigued by logical fallacies. I just purchased your book Logically Fallacious through iBooks. I haven't been able to check it out yet, because it isn't showing up in my iBooks reader. If I can't figure it out, I'll buy it again through Amazon.

Anyway, here's my question:

I'm no fan of Donald Trump, but I was elated when he compared George Washington to Robert E. Lee. Both were military commanders from Virginia - and both owned slaves. How would the corporate media respond?

"It's a ridiculous conflation," said Professor Alice Fahs of the University of California, Irvine. "He's not a founding father, and it's as though Trump thinks he is. It's really astonishing. It's amazing.

Scholars say Trump went afoul in lumping Lee with founders<>.

Am I correct in calling this a logical fallacy? If so, which fallacy is it?

Thank you.

If Trump never said they were both founding fathers and then the media saying that was the issue Trump was implying...I think that is a straw man.
If you're wondering whether trump comparing the two is fallacious, I don't see a fallacy if the only two parallels are the ones you mention. Assuming those two things are actually true, no fallacy.
If you're saying Trump is implying a 'slippery slope' because Lee had similar things in common with Washington. Therefore tearing down one guys statue means that the "mob" will eventually get to Washington...thats a slippery slope fallacy i believe.

I am assuming here that Trump never said anything about Lee being a founding father. In this case, it is a classic strawman because Professor Alice Fahs is responding to an argument Trump never made.

Special pleading? He's essentially saying Washington gets a pass from owning slaves since he's a founding father and Lee isn't.

Alice Fahs is accusing Trump of false analogy, Fahs commits fallacy of special pleading in his response.