Question

...
Share

Because of that, this happened.....

A friend said, "My reasonable priced insurance skyrocketed as soon as Obama decided we all had to have it, whether we wanted it or not. That mandatory decree opened the floodgates for the insurance companies to change double or whatever they wanted." Clearly this is an error in thinking but what do you call it?
asked on Sunday, Jul 14, 2019 06:56:29 PM by Share

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Eat Meat... Or Don't.

Roughly 95% of Americans don’t appear to have an ethical problem with animals being killed for food, yet all of us would have a serious problem with humans being killed for food. What does an animal lack that a human has that justifies killing the animal for food but not the human?

As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.

In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
mchasewalker
0
I think you're hinting at 'Post hoc ergo propter hoc' fallacy, but this is not quite there yet. Logically, it seems people could be experiencing this so there's no real fallacy, or magical leap in reasoning. I tried to refer you to Dr. Bo's explanation, but it doesn't come up just yet. My Wifi connection is acting up so I wouldn't conclude anything else about that.
answered on Sunday, Jul 14, 2019 08:47:24 PM by mchasewalker

Comments

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
0
Post hoc fallacy as Micheal says. However, it could also be a true statement. I would have followed up with "how do you know it was the policy that caused the rate increase?" There could be a definitive reason or it could be just a poor assumption not founded on facts.

Interestingly, I don't cover this one specifically on this site. I need to add it. It is different from the questionable cause fallacy. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pos. . .
answered on Monday, Jul 15, 2019 07:01:52 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Comments

...
Aryan
0

Maybe a short Slippery Slope Fallacy?

answered on Tuesday, Mar 10, 2020 02:20:26 PM by Aryan

Aryan Suggested These Categories

Comments