Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.
In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
Post hoc fallacy as Micheal says. However, it could also be a true statement. I would have followed up with "how do you know it was the policy that caused the rate increase?" There could be a definitive reason or it could be just a poor assumption not founded on facts.
Interestingly, I don't cover this one specifically on this site. I need to add it. It is different from the questionable cause fallacy. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pos. . . |
answered on Monday, Jul 15, 2019 07:01:52 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD |
Comments |
|
|
Maybe a short Slippery Slope Fallacy? |
answered on Tuesday, Mar 10, 2020 02:20:26 PM by Aryan | |
Aryan Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|