|
|
Is there a name for being wrongly accused of a fallacy.In this case I'm not referring to an argument from fallacy, since this means your statement has a fallacy but your argument is sound the person wrongly accuses you of a fallacy and attempts to discredit your argument.
Example: Person 1 states a general rule as should be "typically followed" Person 2 states "I know of x contrary example so you are using a sweeping generalization, so you're wrong" |
| asked on Thursday, Jun 27, 2019 04:29:04 AM by McCarthy | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.
In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
|
If you're asking whether or not there's a fallacy name for wrongly accusing an argument of a fallacy, then no there isn't because a false accusation of a fallacy seems like a factual error and not a reasoning error. Here's how someone might want to discredit an argument by accusing it of a fallacy:
P1: Your argument commits fallacy X. Conclusion: your argument is invalid. This argument is valid, but if there is a false accusation of a fallacy, then premise one becomes false, and thus is a factual error, not a fallacy. |
| answered on Thursday, Jun 27, 2019 05:13:24 AM by Abdulazeez |
Comments |
|
| |
|
|
When you say "typically followed," you are hedging your bets and admitting that your rule has exceptions. Therefore, your opponent just misses the point.
|
| answered on Thursday, Jun 27, 2019 08:18:41 AM by Bill |
Comments |
|
| |
|
|
I would argue that a false accusation of fallacy could be a form of ad hominem (circumstantial).
Ad Hominem (Circumstantial) argumentum ad hominem Description: Suggesting that the person who is making the argument is biased or predisposed to take a particular stance, and therefore, the argument is necessarily invalid. Logical Form: Person 1 is claiming Y. Person 1 has a vested interest in Y being true. (In that they are purposefully being fallacious or deceptive) Therefore, Y is false. |
| answered on Thursday, Jun 27, 2019 11:31:57 AM by mchasewalker |
Comments |
|
| |
