Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Part one is about how science works even when the public thinks it doesn't. Part two will certainly ruffle some feathers by offering a reason- and science-based perspective on issues where political correctness has gone awry. Part three provides some data-driven advice for your health and well-being. Part four looks at human behavior and how we can better navigate our social worlds. In part five we put on our skeptical goggles and critically examine a few commonly-held beliefs. In the final section, we look at a few ways how we all can make the world a better place.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
The writer expresses one opinion, but there is evidence for other foundations for moral beliefs.
DeWaal argues that morality is biological. He is very persuasive (I've heard him speak). Link: www.emory.edu/EMORY_REPOR. . . Others hold that morality is founded in group membership. I don't see why that is automatically wrong. None of that means that morality can be rejected. The idea that morals must either be totally absolute or totally relative is a false dilemma, which is a classic fallacy. |
answered on Thursday, Jul 25, 2019 01:26:00 PM by Bill |
Comments |
|
|
No Logical fallacy is present; this is merely an opinion.
|
answered on Thursday, Jul 25, 2019 02:19:06 PM by modelerr |
Comments |
|