Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Part one is about how science works even when the public thinks it doesn't. Part two will certainly ruffle some feathers by offering a reason- and science-based perspective on issues where political correctness has gone awry. Part three provides some data-driven advice for your health and well-being. Part four looks at human behavior and how we can better navigate our social worlds. In part five we put on our skeptical goggles and critically examine a few commonly-held beliefs. In the final section, we look at a few ways how we all can make the world a better place.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
I think this is just poorly worded by using "them." It is ambiguous. Who is "them"? The Calvinist's argument would be better if worded: |
answered on Saturday, Dec 02, 2017 09:18:17 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD | |
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
|
We can try to use logic to tackle this argument, but it is better to use the text and a method our ministry calls the “SPACE” method. SPACE is an acronym tbat stands for SPeaker, Audience, Context, Explanation. It is important to tackle scripture in that order.
When you do, you see that Jesus is talking to Israel here in John 10, and tbe context is His authenticity and authority as the Messiah. Key point: In typology, His audience is the “lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matt 10:6). What this means is that this passage is specific to its audience and is not making a general statement about mankind. Jesus does allude to “other sheep,” (v16) but He does not define them in any way that could be viewed as inclusionary or exclusionary — except to say they are not of Israel (“this fold”). For those interested, we did a 20-minute Bible study on this section of scripture. See Episode 18, “I Am the Door of the Sheep,” @ motk.org/media.php?pageID. . . |
answered on Wednesday, Dec 06, 2017 08:42:22 AM by Jordan Pine |
Comments |
|
|
Or, maybe, it's simply sarcasm.
|
answered on Friday, Dec 29, 2017 03:21:06 PM by mchasewalker |
Comments |
|