Making assumptions about the cognitive capacities of others

Question

Dr. Beach	Making assumptions about the cognitive capacities of others There is a class of logical fallacies involving the illegitimate attribution of rational ability, comprehension, or belief to others. I believe this sort of fallacy has a familiar name in the literature, but I've forgotten what it is. It is somewhat similar to the Intensional Fallacy, or the Hooded Man Fallacy, but not quite the same. Here is an example: Paul knows (or believes) that Trump is guilty of abusing his power as POTUS. Anyone guilty of abusing his power as POTUS should be impeached. Therefore, Paul knows (or believes) that Trump should be impeached.
	asked on Tuesday, Dec 10, 2019 11:15:45 AM by Dr. Beach
Top Categories Suggested by Community
Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Master the "Rules of Reason" for Making and Evaluating Claims

Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.

This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book.

Take the Online Course

Answers

Bo Bennett, PhD 0	This would fall under a bad assumption or faulty premise. The argument itself is valid, Paul could believe what he wants. What were are objecting to is the process by which Paul formed his beliefs, which is more of a deep dive in epistemology rather than something to do with fallacies. We can make assumptions about the cognitive capacities of others; this is not fallacious. Again, it is the process by which we make those assumptions that can be accurate or not accurate, or the reasons we give for our assumptions could be fallacious. For example, "I think Trump is a moron because he plays golf too much." This would be a non-sequitur because his playing golf too much has no reasonable connection to cognitive capacity. {date-time stamp}Wednesday, Dec 11, 2019 02:34 PM{/date-time stamp} Read Edward's comment below. I read this too quickly and did not consider what was being argued.
	answered on Tuesday, Dec 10, 2019 11:22:42 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD
Comments