Appeal to fiction as a possible fallacy?

Could using something that happened in a work of fiction as an argument be a new fallacy? For instance, there's a meme going round saying that two men raised Simba in The Lion King and he turned out fine, so that proves that same sex couples can raise kids.

Well, first of all, I'm not so sure he did turn out fine, because they encouraged him to turn his back on his problems instead of facing them! And secondly, anything can happen in a fictional story, whereas real life is often different, so fictional events aren't reliable proof of what's possible or plausible in reality.

A possible exception could be if a story is specifically written with a particular message or lesson in mind, such as Aesop's Fables. Indeed, there may be a possible converse to this fallacy which could be called the 'That didn't happen' fallacy. Sometimes it's the message that's important, rather than whether the story actually happened.

asked on Sunday, Jun 06, 2021 03:14:39 PM by Philip

Top Categories Suggested by Community


Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Like the Site? You'll Love the Book!

This book is a crash course, meant to catapult you into a world where you start to see things how they really are, not how you think they are.  The focus of this book is on logical fallacies, which loosely defined, are simply errors in reasoning.  With the reading of each page, you can make significant improvements in the way you reason and make decisions.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book


Bo Bennett, PhD

On the one hand, using a fictional story to support a real-life narrative can be a failure to distinguish fantasy from reality. For example, "Harry Potter can do magic, so why can't you?" On the other hand, many people use fiction as a way illustrate a point. For example, "Harry Potter couldn't have beaten Voldemort without the help from his friends. We all need help sometimes." I would say, the vast majority of "appeals to fiction" fall in the latter category, and any in the former category would border more on intellectual deficiency than fallacious reasoning.

A caveat here: Many people believe works of fiction are factual, as in the case of religious texts and cultural mythology. If the stories are indeed fiction/fantasy, then this would be a case of being factually incorrect rather than poor reasoning (how they got to believe the stories to be factual could be fallacious).


there's a meme going round saying that two men raised Simba in The Lion King and he turned out fine, so that proves that same sex couples can raise kids. 

The meme says "Two men raised Simba, and he turned out fine." Let's ignore the obvious problems already discussed, and the fact that pig and meerkat aren't "men." This is one example of two "men" raising a "child." Does this mean that it worked in this one case? Sometimes it works? All the time? It is unclear and perhaps purposely ambiguous. There are many possible fallacies one can fall victim to when interpreting this. As for the meme itself it is certainly guilty of anthropomorphism . This meme could result in a rare case of someone really thinking that this evidence for the success of same-sex couples raising children. If this is the case, I think it is so rare that a named fallacy is not justified; it might simply be the person coming to that conclusion has some kind of intellectual disability.

answered on Monday, Jun 07, 2021 07:54:56 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories


Rationalissimus of the Elenchus writes:

Yep, that's what I was thinking. The meme  probably  should not be interpreted literally.

posted on Monday, Jun 07, 2021 08:32:31 AM
Rationalissimus of the Elenchus

I'm pretty sure something like this is intended to be a little tongue-in-cheek. Thus, it's a meme rather than an argument, so no fallacies.

However, if intended as a genuine argument (unlikely); you could argue that it's a weak analogy.  Fiction does not always lend itself easily to real life, especially when not based on real people, because authors can create their own logic at odds with reality. Thus, the situations at hand are too dissimilar to compare. 

The point about Aesop's Fables is accurate, since they are actually intended as analogies.

answered on Sunday, Jun 06, 2021 04:02:38 PM by Rationalissimus of the Elenchus

Rationalissimus of the Elenchus Suggested These Categories