|
Fallacy?1. There is no reason to love someone who doesn't love you back. 2. Mother loves her children but children doesn't love her. 3. Therefore mother shouldn't love their children |
|||
asked on Sunday, Jul 25, 2021 08:30:59 AM by TrappedPrior (RotE) | ||||
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
||||
Comments |
||||
|
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Many of our ideas about the world are based more on feelings than facts, sensibilities than science, and rage than reality. We gravitate toward ideas that make us feel comfortable in areas such as religion, politics, philosophy, social justice, love and sex, humanity, and morality. We avoid ideas that make us feel uncomfortable. This avoidance is a largely unconscious process that affects our judgment and gets in the way of our ability to reach rational and reasonable conclusions. By understanding how our mind works in this area, we can start embracing uncomfortable ideas and be better informed, be more understanding of others, and make better decisions in all areas of life.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
No fallacy. Of course, premise 1 is debatable. |
answered on Sunday, Jul 25, 2021 08:43:35 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD | |
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
|
Aside from what others have mentioned, we have elements of the ambiguity fallacy from implicitly redefining terms leading to a non sequitur wherein we jump from having no reason for doing something to being advised against it. If we accept the premises as true, P1 talks about there being no reason to love someone in a given situation and P2 describes the situation occurring. The logical conclusion from these two premises would be that the mother has no reason to love her children ... not that she shouldn't. |
answered on Monday, Jul 26, 2021 10:19:50 AM by Arlo | |
Arlo Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|