What's it call when people blame things they don't understand on things they don't approve of and then recommend a "virtuous" course of action?

Examples:

Biblical times:

The crops have failed. Clearly God is displeased by your lack of humility. Sacrifice your cattle to him to show you are sorry.

Modern times:

Doctor: Not sure what's wrong with you but I suspect its because you're overweight. Start on this new diet and exercise regime and call me when you've lost 20lbs.

asked on Wednesday, Jul 29, 2020 11:53:03 AM by Katherine

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Bo Bennett, PhD writes:

In addition to my answer below, I just wanted to comment that your modern times example is far less problematic than your Biblical times one. In your modern times example, the doctor could be giving their expert opinion. They stated as much by admitting uncertainty in the diagnoses. Being overweight is a common comorbidity so this is not unreasonable. Had the doctor said, "but I suspect you are not right with God," then that would be a very different story.

posted on Wednesday, Jul 29, 2020 12:18:11 PM

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Uncomfortable Ideas: Facts don't care about feelings. Science isn't concerned about sensibilities. And reality couldn't care less about rage.

This is a book about uncomfortable ideas—the reasons we avoid them, the reasons we shouldn’t, and discussion of dozens of examples that might infuriate you, offend you, or at least make you uncomfortable.

Many of our ideas about the world are based more on feelings than facts, sensibilities than science, and rage than reality. We gravitate toward ideas that make us feel comfortable in areas such as religion, politics, philosophy, social justice, love and sex, humanity, and morality. We avoid ideas that make us feel uncomfortable. This avoidance is a largely unconscious process that affects our judgment and gets in the way of our ability to reach rational and reasonable conclusions. By understanding how our mind works in this area, we can start embracing uncomfortable ideas and be better informed, be more understanding of others, and make better decisions in all areas of life.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

Bo Bennett, PhD

I would say

1) Claiming a cause when the cause is unknown is Argument from Ignorance and Jumping to Conclusions .

2) then blaming on things one disapproves of is a form of Shoehorning

3) then recommend a "virtuous" course of action is just an opinion.

answered on Wednesday, Jul 29, 2020 12:09:39 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories

Comments

0	Katherine writes: Thank you. I appreciate your time. :-)
	posted on Wednesday, Jul 29, 2020 12:42:31 PM

mchasewalker

What's it call (sic) when people blame things (on things) they don't understand...?

Promiscuous teleology, or, hyper active agency detection.

What's it call (sic) when people blame things they don't understand on things they don't approve of...?

Superstition, selective moral superiority, or religious judgmentalism.

What's it call (sic) when people blame things they don't understand on things they don't approve of and then recommend a "virtuous" course of action?

Theodicy.

answered on Wednesday, Jul 29, 2020 03:47:39 PM by mchasewalker

mchasewalker Suggested These Categories

Comments

1	Mr Z writes: Regarding the third item. Theodicy is typically defined as an answer to why an O-3 God would allow evil - either moral evil or seemingly meaningless physical suffering. Perhaps ignorant prejudice?
	posted on Wednesday, Jul 29, 2020 09:51:32 PM

0	mchasewalker writes: I was being flippant, but perhaps theology would be a funnier reply?
	posted on Thursday, Jul 30, 2020 05:00:40 PM