Planned Parenthood sells body parts, and the objection is based on what?

The headline reads "Planned Parenthood ADMITS to Selling Baby Body Parts" and contains at least one fallacy.
What must one presume (other than the fact/truth of the matter) for the headline to make a case against Planned Parenthood (as Freedom Wire clearly intended to do)?
https://freedomwire.com/planned-parenthood-admits-to-selling-baby-body-parts/?utm_source=FRW-Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Daily-Article-Traffic

I hope to present my analysis in a future response, but await the contributors' analyses first.

I don't see a fallacy per se, but only a difference in values. Some people find the selling of fetal tissue to be immoral.
There is the use of loaded words: "body parts" sounds awful; "fetal tissue" would sound more clinical. But that's not a logical error, only a rhetorical choice.
You might read Language in Thought and Action to learn more about loaded words.

Looks like an Appeal to Popularity fallacy to me.

The word admits is associated with guilt, which is a bad things thus is an appeal to emotion