Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Part one is about how science works even when the public thinks it doesn't. Part two will certainly ruffle some feathers by offering a reason- and science-based perspective on issues where political correctness has gone awry. Part three provides some data-driven advice for your health and well-being. Part four looks at human behavior and how we can better navigate our social worlds. In part five we put on our skeptical goggles and critically examine a few commonly-held beliefs. In the final section, we look at a few ways how we all can make the world a better place.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
Simply calling attention to the technique should be sufficient. For example, "You have listed a number of arguments, all of which deserve to be addressed. However, let's take one at a time." A more assertive response might be "You have made many unsupported claims, all of which have been debunked ad nauseaum ." You can continue with "I would be glad to debunk them all for you here, but this would be outside the scope of this debate." or "Let's take them one at a time."
Another technique is to simply provide a link to place where someone else responded to the claim. For example: Person 1: The earth is flat. Pigs fly. Elvis is still alive. Person 2: "The earth is flat." - No, it's not: nasa.gov... "Pigs fly" - No, they don't: pigsdontfly.com... "Elvis is still alive" - No, he's not: elvisiswormfood.com... The important part is to project confidence that these claims being made are without merit (if, in fact they are). |
answered on Monday, Mar 30, 2015 07:41:48 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD |
Comments |
|