(also known as: blind obedience, the "team player" appeal, Nuremberg defense, divine authority [form of], appeal to/argument from blind authority)
Description: Asserting that a proposition is true solely on the authority making the claim while extreme cases also ignore any counter evidence no matter how strong. The authority could be parents, a coach, a boss, a military leader, or a divine authority.
Person 1 says Y is true.
Person 1 is seen as the ultimate authority.
Therefore, Y is true.
During the Nazi war crimes trials at Nuremberg after World War II, Nazi war criminals were charged with genocide, mass murder, torture, and other atrocities. Their defense: "I was only following orders".
Explanation: Most of us begin our lives seeing our parents as the ultimate authority, and we experience their wrath when we question that authority. Unfortunately, this bad habit is carried over into adulthood where we replace our parents with a coach, a boss, a teacher, a commander, or a god. Rather than question, we blindly follow. This fallacy has probably resulted in more deaths, pain, suffering, and misery than all others combined.
Your honor, the Bible clearly says that psychics, wizards, and mediums are to be stoned to death and that it is our responsibility to do so (Leviticus 20:27). Therefore, I had every right to try to stone Dianne Warwick, and her psychic friends, to death.
Explanation: Most Americans do see the Bible as the ultimate authority, but that darn, pesky legal system gets in the way.
Exception: To quote Col. Jessep from A Few Good Men, “We follow orders, son. We follow orders or people die. It's that simple. Are we clear?” I have never served in the military, so I cannot say how far I would go when just, “following orders”. I wouldn’t want anyone to die because I questioned orders, yet I wouldn’t want anyone to die because I followed orders blindly. I guess this is why I am not in the military.